By Scott Higgins, Partner, and Simon Bedak, Paralegal
In our September 2018 article Security of Payment amendments released in NSW – the good, the bad and the controversial, Mills Oakley prepared a detailed article regarding the NSW Government’s proposed amendments to the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act (1999) (the Act).
Today’s quick update will highlight what’s new in the Draft Regulations and the areas in which the new offences seek to ‘pierce the corporate veil’ and strengthen the enforcement regime.
The three highlights of these amending Regulations are:
- Owner-occupier construction contracts will be exempted from the Act;
- executive liability offences are now set out with respect to retention money trust accounts; and
- a range of offences both under the Act and the Regulations for which penalty notices may be issued and the amounts of penalties payable are now specified
Executive Liability Offences
The Draft Regulations (Reg.5A) target section 34D of the Amending Act in what it describes as ‘Executive Liability Offences’. The note in the draft Regulations relevantly confirms:
“Section 34D of the Act provides for the personal liability of directors for certain offences committed by a corporation”.
There is a schedule of fines being both on a corporate level as well as upon an individual. This represents a significant development in the Security of Payment regime with individuals no longer able to be protected behind the corporate veil in respect of certain offences.
Having said that, we consider it unlikely that the fines will provide anything other than a modest deterrent factor. Problems with fraudulent or inaccurate supporting statements and widespread non-compliance with the retention requirements are unlikely to be remedied by these amendments alone.
The corporate fines imposed for offences under the Act and Regulations range between $5,500 and $11,000, together with fines for individuals ranging between $1,100 and $2,200.
|Corporation fine||Individual fine|
|Section 13(7)||A head contractor must not serve a payment claim on the principal unless the claim is accompanied by a supporting statement that indicates that it relates to that payment claim.||$11,000||$2,200|
|Section 26A(5)||Principal contractor can be required to retain money owed to respondent||$5,500||$1,100|
|Section 26B(5)||Obligation of principal contractor to retain money owed to respondent||$5,500||$1,100|
|Section 26D(3)||Protections for principal contractor||$5,500||$1,100|
|Section 26E(2)||Respondent to provide information about principal contractor||$5,500||$1,100|
|Corporation fine||Individual fine|
|Reg 6(1)||Retention money to be held in trust account||$11,000||$2,200|
|Reg 7(3)||Requirements for establishment of trust account||$11,000||$2,200|
|Reg 8(1)||Withdrawals from trust account||$11,000||$2,200|
|Reg 11||Overdrawn trust account||$11,000||$2,200|
|Reg 12||Closure of trust account||$11,000||$2,200|
|Reg 14(1) or (2)||Trust account records||$11,000||$2,200|
|Reg 15(3)||Power to require information||$11,000||$2,200|
Some possible penalty notice scenarios under the draft Regulations
After the Draft Regulations are passed, the following scenarios may result in the penalties outlined above:
Incorrect or absent supporting statements
A contractor’s Payment Claim which:
- has a incorrect supporting statement attached (for instance, the previous claim’s supporting statement has been attached rather than the current one), or,
- omits the inclusion of the supporting statement when served on the Principal
may soon result in an $11,000 under section13(7).
The Respondent fails to provide information about the principal contractor to the claimant
Under section 26E(1) of the Act, an adjudicator may, in connection with an adjudication application (and at the request of the claimant), direct the respondent to provide information to the claimant as to the identity and contact details of any person who is a principal contractor in relation to the claim.
Failing to comply with a direction of an adjudicator and not providing the claimant with “the identity and contact details of any person who is a principal contractor in relation to the claim” under this section may result in the respondent incurring a $5,500 penalty.
A head contractor failing to report within 14 days
If a head contractor fails to advise the Secretary of the closure of a retention money trust account in writing within 14 days, they may be fined $11,000 for the failure.
A head contractor or subcontractor failing to comply with a direction under Regulation 15
Regulation 15 grants power to any authorised officer (under s.36 of the Act) to direct that a head contractor or sub-contractor (as well as any approved authorised deposit-taking institution) provide the office with any information sought in respect of the following matters:
- the value of any construction contract entered into with a principal by the head contractor;
- details regarding retention money retained by the head contractor under a construction contract with a subcontractor; or
- details regarding a retention money trust account established by the head contractor for the purposes of that Part under the Act
Failure to comply with a direction under Regulation 15 to provide any required information in writing to the Secretary within a period of 7 days after the direction is given under regulation 15 (or a longer period if specified), may also soon result in a penalty of $11,000 being imposed.
The NSW Government has determined there is a public consultation period until 5.00pm 21 June 2019 and any submissions about the Draft Regulations briefly touched on above may be made here.
If you would like to discuss how the Draft Regulations will affect your business, please contact Mills Oakley.