MV “APL England” loses containers overboard, again. Protect your rights in cargo interests

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Maurice Lynch, Special Counsel and Tom Mangan, Lawyer

Last weekend, MV “APL England” lost over 40 containers overboard off the coast of NSW during poor weather conditions and another 80 have been damaged on board the ship. Notably, a similar incident impacted the very same vessel, MV “APL England” in 2016 when it lost approximately 30 containers during a voyage from Fremantle to Port Botany.

Container ships are now capable of carrying thousands of containers and the potential for these incidents to occur has increased. Once again, Australian freight forwarders and consignees have been impacted by a container stow collapse.

Freight forwarders and cargo owners can be placed in a difficult position when news of these events breaks out. They will often be the last to find out and will not have access to information when they learn that their cargo has been affected that will allow them to determine the cause of the collapse, such as poor lashing, poorly maintained securing points or incorrect stability calculations for the contemplated voyage.

However, by acting quickly freight forwarders and cargo owners can potentially obtain information which will assist them in making a decision as to whether or not a vessel owner is liable for a claim arising from a container stow collapse. When a freight forwarder or cargo owner becomes aware of a container stow collapse, they should:

  1. notify their marine insurer of a potential claim and provide them with all supporting documentation including the relevant bill of lading, packing list and commercial invoice;
  2. explore options of appointing surveyors or investigators (usually a former master mariner);
  3. make contact with the representatives of the vessel owner (usually their lawyers) and request that the vessel owner permit their appointed surveyor access to the vessel when it berths to undertake an inspection of the collapsed container stacks;
  4. request the vessel owner preserve damaged materials and materials and equipment used to secure the containers; and
  5. request relevant ship’s documents such as log books, tall documents, stow plans, lashing plans and stability documentation.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau also conducted its own concurrent investigation and the Australian Maritime Safety Authority has now detained the vessel and released a short statement identifying

“Inspections of the ship has found inadequate lashing arrangements for cargo and heavily corroded securing points for containers on the deck”

AMSA’s published comments suggest that the vessel owners may have failed to properly and carefully load, handle, stow, carry, keep, care for, and discharge the goods carried, and failed to make all parts of the ship in which goods are carried fit and safe for their reception, carriage and preservation, in accordance with Article 3(1)(c) and (2) of the Amended Hague Rules.

Noting that the vessel has been detained by AMSA on the basis that the lashing arrangements were inadequate and securing points for containers on the deck were “heavily corroded”, it is hoped and anticipated that carriers will settle claims for lost or damaged cargo at an early stage.

With the vessel now being detained by AMSA, there may be delays in obtaining delivery of consignments and alternative methods to forward the consignments to their destination may need to be considered if the consignment is time critical.

 Note: Mills Oakley successfully represented cargo interests in the MV “Cosco Fukuyama”, MV “APL England” and MV “YM Efficiency” container stow collapses.

For further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Get the latest news insights and articles straight to your inbox, simply enter your details.




    *Required Fields


    Special Leave Granted to Appeal the decision in Carmichael Rail Network Pty Ltd v BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co. KG (The BBC Nile) ] [2022] FCAFC 171