Partner

Stefan Sudweeks

Stefan has been a commercial litigator for approximately 30 years, the last 15 of which specialising in PI, D & O, Property and liability insurance (and reinsurance). His practice spans across both WA and NSW.

Stefan is known for providing clear and unequivocal indemnity advice and defending claims strategically and economically or settling claims early, whichever is in the best interests of his clients.

Stefan is recognised internationally as a “Leader in his Field” by Chambers and Partners, as a “preeminent leading PI lawyer” in Doyle's Guide, recommended in Legal 500 for the past five years and he’s also been included in Best Lawyers in Australia.

He has been widely praised for his diligent approach and "ability to clearly articulate the relevant issues." Clients assert that they "benefit directly from his deep specialist expertise" in this field.

In Chambers and Partners for 2022 clients have said Stefan is “an extremely competent lawyer who brings many years of experience to the table” and that Stefan is “very forensic and intelligent” and that “he’s outstanding. If I were a director being sued, I’d have no problem calling him”.

Expertise

Stefan’s expertise includes:

  • Policy interpretation/coverage advice for both National insurers and Lloyd’s Syndicates
  • Defence of claims against solicitors, barristers, architects, engineers, accountants, members of the finance industry and various other professionals
  • Successfully mediating/resolving by ADR disputed claims
  • Acting for insurers on subrogated claims
  • Publishing papers and presenting seminars on insurance related issues and legal developments

Recent Projects

  • Acted for certain directors in the successful defence of a claim for approx. $500m for an alleged breach of their fiduciary duties in the company’s decision to acquire the shares in an acquisition company, which decision resulted in the company going into external administration owing more than $800m.
  • Acted for a CFO in the defence of a claim against him and several directors for $100m. After 6 weeks of trial judgement was delivered against the Plaintiffs and costs were awarded against the Plaintiffs on an indemnity basis.
  • Acted for a valuer in the defence of a claim for $6m arising from an alleged breach of duties and misrepresentations. The Federal Court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ claim with indemnity costs. On Appeal by the Plaintiffs to the Full Court of the Federal Court, Stefan appeared as Counsel. The appeal was dismissed with indemnity costs being awarded against the Plaintiffs.
  • Acted for an Insured who was alleged to have breached its duties as escrow agent causing loss in excess of $5m. The claim brought against the Insured failed at trial and again on appeal. Indemnity costs pursuant to the escrow agreement were awarded to the Insured.

Professional Memberships / Accreditation & Activities

  • Recognised Lawyer, Insurance Law, Litigation and Product Liability Litigation,  Best Lawyers Australia
  • Recommended Lawyer, Leading Professional Indemnity Lawyers – WA, 2021, Doyle’s Guide
  • Ranked Lawyer (Band 3), Insurance, Chambers Asia-Pacific
  • Member, Law Society of NSW and WA
  • Member, Australian Insurance Lawyers Association (AILA)

    Sector

location

Sydney

Thinking

Insurance
Outsourced IT Providers’ Liability for...
Insurance
Clash of judgements on section 40(3) of the...
Insurance
The 1 million dollar hot chip payout –...
Insurance
Notification of a “Problem” under s 40(3)...
Insurance
Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Group Life...
Insurance
How Not To Sue Your Legal Practitioner:...
Insurance
Russell v Carpenter [2022] NSWCA 252 Provides...
Insurance
When you think you’re covered and you’re...
Insurance
Anti-vaxxers and damages for economic loss:...
MO
Insurance
The Employee That Was Let Go And Let Down –...
Insurance
Houghton v Potts [2022] NSWSC 1778:...
Insurance
The ‘Hardiman’ principle – whether it...
Insurance
A snapshot of registered health practitioner...
Insurance
VCAT upholds immediate suspension of GP...
Insurance
The District Court of NSW has Increased its...
Insurance
Life Insurance in Superannuation: AFCA lacked...
Insurance
A snapshot of registered health practitioner...
Insurance
VCAT accepts charges relating to dishonesty...
Insurance
Liability for unlawful acts in employment...
Insurance
Personal costs orders – ‘a shield not a...
Insurance
Frost v Northern Beaches Council [2022] NSWSC...
Insurance
A snapshot of registered health practitioner...
Insurance
Counsellor who engaged in inappropriate...
Insurance
TPD Insurer – No Duty to Reconsider a Claim...
Insurance
“You’re Fired!” – Supreme Court...
Insurance
Back to basics – breach, section 5B and the...
Insurance
A shield not a sword: the NSW Court of Appeal...
Insurance
Group Life Insurance – misrepresentation,...
Insurance
Elements applicable to a release from the...
Insurance
A snapshot of registered health practitioner...
Insurance
Is it really expert evidence? Milanovic v...
Insurance
Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal confirms...
Insurance
Fair Work Commission considers who is the...
Insurance
Mills Oakley has settled Australia’s first...
Insurance
Combustible Cladding – Another Twist:...
Insurance
Double Whammy – NSW Supreme Court...
Insurance
Victoria’s Supreme Court of Appeal confirms...
Insurance
Supreme Court of Victoria’s Court of Appeal...
Insurance
Necessity of view is insufficient connecting...
Insurance
Drivers beware – don’t forget to consider...
Insurance
Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal confirms...
Insurance
VCAT supports Pharmacy Board’s immediate...
Insurance
Drunk pedestrian hit by car held 70% liable...
Insurance
A snapshot of registered health practitioner...
Insurance
Vicarious Liability of Employers and Acts of...
Insurance
Can I force my employee to return to working...
Insurance
Cleanaway Waste Management Ltd v Insurance...
Insurance
“Double insurance” or not? CTP insurer...
Insurance
Singh v Ward [2022] VSC 155: Emergency lanes...
Insurance
A snapshot of registered health practitioner...
Insurance
Weinstein v Health Complaints Commissioner...
Insurance
Employee or independent contractor? Just...
Insurance
Dodson v Woolworths Group Limited:...
Insurance
Avant v Darshn: Notice of circumstances given...
Insurance
A snapshot of registered health practitioner...
Insurance
Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal confirms...
Insurance
Landmark ruling confirms defective passage...
Insurance
Archer v Garcia [2022] VSC 57: Driver at...
Insurance
The Grape Escape from Liability – Plaintiff...

Special Counsel

Thomas Blanch

View the next profile