Insurance in MOtion December 2025

Welcome to Insurance in MOtion! We're excited to share the latest insights and updates with you.
December 5 2025

ACT Responds to Bird V DP: Law Expands Organisational Liability for Child Abuse

Bird v DP (a Pseudonym) [2024] HCA 41

By Nikki Cassar, Partner 

The ACT has passed new legislation addressing the High Court’s decision in Bird v DP, introducing broader organisational liability for child abuse.

Read more here

When Inordinate Delay in Prosecuting Your Litigation Will Defeat Your Claim 

Pentridge Village Pty Ltd (in liq) (recs and mgrs appted) v Capital Finance Australia Ltd [2025] VSCA 290

By Stuart Eustice, Partner and Rory MacDonald, Associate

The Victorian Court of Appeal recently considered whether a long-running proceeding should be dismissed for want of prosecution, highlighting the serious consequences of prolonged and unjustified litigation delays.

Read more here

Supreme Court Weighs in on the General Environmental Duty in Victoria 

Environment Projection Authority v Veolia Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 696

By Sarah Fountain, Partner and Adiam Tsegay, Senior Associate

The Supreme Court of Victoria has approved a major settlement in one of the EPA’s earliest civil penalty proceedings under the Environment Protection Act 2017, underscoring the regulator’s increasing focus on licence compliance and significant penalties for poor environmental risk management.

Read more here

Faulty Workmanship Exclusions: Clarifying the Boundary Between Defect and Resultant Damage

Helicopter Aerial Surveys Pty Ltd v Insurance Australia Pty LTD (NO 2) [2025] FCA 1360

By Bronwyn Ackland, Partner and Poppy Scaife, Paralegal

The Federal Court has clarified how faulty workmanship exclusions apply where defective work leads to consequential damage, underscoring the limits of insurers’ reliance on exclusion clauses and the evidentiary burden required to deny indemnity.

Read more here

Consistency Is Key: Inconsistency as an Abuse of the Process in Kekatos Lawyers v Dana Rahme [2025] NSWSC 1320

Kekatos Lawyers v Dana Rahme [2025] NSWSC 1320

By Louise Cantrill, Partner, Tamara James, Associate and Isabella Gerardi, Lawyer

Walton J has delivered the latest decision in the long-running dispute between Dana Rahme and her former solicitors, finding her cross-claim to be an abuse of process due to pleadings inconsistent with her own evidence and prior Court determinations.

Read more here

When Is a Penumbral Duty Not Penumbral

Surman v Gateway Lawyers (A Firm) [2025] QSC 287

By Louise Cantrill, Partner, Tamara James, Associate and Isabella Gerardi, Lawyer

Cooper J of the Supreme Court of Queensland has handed down judgment in Surman v Gateway Lawyers, a claim brought by the trustee of the KJM Family Trust against the firm for advice provided to the former trustee on the purchase of a residential unit.

Read more here

Back to the Future: When Is the Damage Done and Proving the Alternative 

R Lawyers v Mr Daily & Anor [2025] HCA 41

By Louise Cantrill, Partner, Tamara James, Associate and Isabella Gerardi, Lawyer

A recent High Court decision in an appeal brought by Mr Daily (a pseudonym) against his former solicitors provides firm guidance on when loss crystallises and how to prove the counterfactual in solicitors’ negligence claims.

Read more here