Litig8: The privilege trap: implied waiver

July, 2016

By Caitlin Taylor, Senior Associate

Each month as a part of Mills Oakley’s Litig8, we bring to you snapshots of eight key cases, legislative changes or other legal events. The summaries are not comprehensive and do not constitute legal advice. You should seek professional advice before taking any action based on the content of this email.

Part 2 of Litig8 Edition 3

The Federal Court has recently considered whether privilege in certain legal advices had been impliedly waived by the conduct of the Public Trustee in Oztech Pty Ltd v Public Trustee of Queensland (No 8) (2016) FCA 712.

Oztech contended that the Public Trustee had impliedly waived privilege over advices and briefing documents that were mentioned in a transcript attached to a letter disclosed in proceedings.  It asserted that the failure to redact parts of the transcript which referred to the substance of the legal advices were inconsistent with the maintenance of privilege and therefore constituted an implied waiver.

The Courts will impute an intention to waive privilege where the actions of a party are plainly inconsistent with the maintenance of the confidentiality which the privilege is intended to protect.

Whilst in this case, the Court determined that the Public Trustee’s conduct in producing the relevant portion of the transcript and in not seeking its return or redaction were not inconsistent with it maintaining privilege in the legal advices, it serves as a reminder of the importance to:

  1. Carefully review all documents (including the content of attachments) being disclosed in proceedings for privilege; and
  2. Maintain a consistent position in relation to privileged documents, particularly in circumstances where those documents may have been inadvertently disclosed.

Contact Mills Oakley

Melbourne

andrew-brown

Andrew Brown | Partner
T: +61 3 9605 0961
E: abrown@millsoakley.com.au

ariel-borland

Ariel Borland | Partner

T: +61 3 9605 0015
E: aborland@millsoakley.com.au

darren-james

Darren James | Partner
T: +61 3 9605 0952
E: djames@millsoakley.com.au

james-tobin

James Tobin | Partner
T: +61 3 9605 0851
E: jtobin@millsoakley.com.au

joanne-hardwick

Joanne Hardwick | Partner
T: +61 3 9605 0949
E: jhardwick@millsoakley.com.au

mark-wenn

Mark Wenn | Partner
T: +61 3 9605 0913
E: mwenn@millsoakley.com.au

roger-jepson

Roger Jepson | Partner
T: +61 3 9605 0899
E: rjepson@millsoakley.com.au

stuart-lewin

Stuart Lewin | Partner
T: +61 3 9605 0986
E: slewin@millsoakley.com.au

Canberra

mark-flint

Mark Flint | Partner
T: +61 2 6196 5217
E: mdflint@millsoakley.com.au

matthew-roser

Matthew Roser | Partner
T: +61 2 6196 5229
E: mroser@millsoakley.com.au

Sydney

damian-ward

Damian Ward | Partner
T: +61 2 8289 5862
E: dward@millsoakley.com.au

gerard-breen

Gerard Breen | Partner
T: +61 2 8035 7888
E: gbreen@millsoakley.com.au

jeremy-mackenzie

Jeremy Mackenzie | Partner
T: +61 2 8289 5807
E: jmackenzie@millsoakley.com.au


peter-hodges

Peter Hodges | Partner
T: +61 2 8035 7845
E: phodges@millsoakley.com.au

mark-tierney

Mark Tierney | Special Counsel
T: +61 2 8035 7920
E: mtierney@millsoakley.com.au

Perth

craig-gough

Craig Gough | Partner
T: +61 8 6167 9807
E: cgough@millsoakley.com.au

Brisbane

dale-cliff

Dale Cliff | Partner
T: +61 7 3228 0430
E: dcliff@millsoakley.com.au

samuel-barber

Samuel Barber | Special Counsel
T: +61 7 3228 0477
E: sbarber@millsoakley.com.au

stephen-dickens

Stephen Dickens | Partner
T: +61 7 3228 0445
E: sdickens@millsoakley.com.au

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use